Global agriculture faces a massive threat as natural bee populations suffer from Colony Collapse Disorder and habitat loss. In response, researchers at the Wyss Institute at Harvard University have developed RoboBees. These autonomous flying microrobots are designed to mimic the biology of a honeybee, offering a potential technological solution to pollination shortages that could threaten global food security.
The RoboBee is not a standard drone. It is a masterpiece of microrobotics engineered by Robert Wood and his team at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering. Unlike commercial quadcopters that use rotating motors, RoboBees use artificial muscles to fly.
These robots are incredibly small. A single RoboBee weighs approximately 80 milligrams, which is lighter than a tenth of a paperclip. To achieve flight, the team invented a manufacturing process called “pop-up MEMS” (micro-electromechanical systems). This technique allows them to construct complex 3D structures from laser-cut 2D materials like carbon fiber and Kapton.
The wings of a RoboBee do not spin. Instead, they flap. The robot uses piezoelectric actuators—strips of ceramic that expand and contract when an electric field is applied. These ceramic strips act like muscles, flapping the wings at 120 times per second. This high frequency is necessary to keep the tiny robot airborne and mimics the rapid wing speed of actual insects.
The push for robotic pollinators is driven by economic and environmental necessity. According to the USDA, one out of every three bites of food in the United States depends on honeybees and other pollinators. This adds more than $15 billion in value to U.S. agricultural crops each year.
However, beekeepers have reported losses of 30% to 90% of their hives in recent winters due to a combination of pesticides, climate change, and disease. Specific crops are at high risk:
While researchers work to save biological bees, RoboBees serve as an insurance policy. The goal is not to replace nature, but to support it during critical shortages.
One of the biggest hurdles in microrobotics is power storage. Batteries are heavy. If the battery is too big, the robot cannot fly. If the battery is small enough to fly, it only lasts for a few seconds.
To solve this, the Harvard team took inspiration from real biology. Bees do not fly constantly; they land, rest, and observe. The researchers developed an electro-adhesive patch located on top of the RoboBee. This patch uses static electricity to allow the robot to stick to the underside of a leaf or a glass surface.
By “perching” rather than hovering, the robot requires 1,000 times less energy. This allows the RoboBee to conserve power between flights, making long-duration missions in a field feasible.
While the RoboBee can fly, swim, and perch, it is not yet ready for the farm. There are significant engineering hurdles that the Wyss Institute and other organizations are currently addressing.
Early versions of the RoboBee were tethered. They received power and commands through a microscopic wire connected to an external power source. In 2019, the team debuted the “RoboBee X-Wing,” which uses tiny solar cells and an additional pair of wings to achieve untethered flight. However, the flight time remains extremely short, and the solar panels require intense light (three times the brightness of the sun) to generate enough power.
For a RoboBee to pollinate a field, it needs to be autonomous. It must identify a flower, determine if it has already been pollinated, and navigate wind gusts. Currently, the “brain” (processing power) is located off-board on a separate computer. Engineers are working to shrink microprocessors to fit on the 80-milligram frame without weighing it down.
A robot that weighs less than a raindrop is easily tossed around by a breeze. While the piezoelectric wings can adjust instantly to stabilize the robot, flying in open fields with variable wind conditions remains a complex control problem.
Harvard is not alone in the race to automate pollination. Other institutions and corporations are developing their own solutions.
The ultimate vision for RoboBees is “swarm intelligence.” In this scenario, thousands of RoboBees would be released into a field. They would communicate with each other using simple signals, similar to how ants or bees coordinate without a single commander.
If one robot finds a patch of unpollinated flowers, it could signal the rest of the swarm to converge. This decentralized approach ensures that if a few robots fail or are eaten by birds, the mission continues successfully. While full deployment is likely a decade away, the rapid progress at the Wyss Institute suggests that robotic insects will eventually play a role in high-tech agriculture.
Are RoboBees being used on farms right now? No. RoboBees are currently in the research and development phase inside laboratories. They face challenges regarding battery life and wind resistance that must be solved before outdoor deployment.
Do RoboBees produce honey? No. RoboBees are mechanical devices designed strictly for pollination and surveillance. They do not collect nectar or produce food.
How much does a RoboBee cost? Current prototypes are expensive due to the manual labor involved in the “pop-up” assembly process. However, the materials (carbon fiber, plastic, ceramics) are relatively cheap. The goal is to mass-produce them for pennies per unit.
Can a RoboBee sting a human? No. They do not have stingers. They are extremely fragile and lightweight; colliding with a human would likely break the robot rather than harm the person.
Will these robots replace real bees? The creators, including Robert Wood, state that the goal is not to replace biological bees. The primary goal is to provide a backup for crop pollination and to use the technology for search and rescue or environmental monitoring.