Recent scientific findings have fundamentally changed how we view one of the earth’s most essential resources. A comprehensive study led by researchers at Stockholm University has determined that rainwater everywhere on Earth is unsafe to drink due to the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly known as PFAS. This marks a significant turning point in environmental science, indicating that these man-made chemicals have permeated every corner of the planetary atmosphere.
The core of this revelation comes from research published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology. The study, led by Ian Cousins, analyzed rainwater data from across the globe. The results were startling. Even in the most remote and isolated locations, such as Antarctica and the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau, the levels of PFAS in rainwater exceeded the safety guidelines set by environmental agencies.
The study specifically looked at four types of perfluoroalkyl acids. The researchers compared the levels found in rain to the lifetime drinking water health advisories issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In many cases, the levels found in rain were drastically higher than what the EPA considers safe for human consumption.
This suggests that the planet has crossed a “planetary boundary” for chemical pollution. This concept refers to a threshold beyond which the stability of the Earth’s ecosystem is compromised. Because PFAS circulate continuously through the water cycle (evaporating from oceans and falling as rain), they have become a pervasive global blanket that ignores national borders.
To understand the gravity of the situation, you must understand the chemistry. PFAS are a family of thousands of synthetic chemicals that have been used in industry and consumer products since the 1940s. They are nicknamed “forever chemicals” because of their molecular structure.
PFAS molecules are built on a chain of carbon and fluorine atoms. The carbon-fluorine bond is one of the strongest bonds in organic chemistry. Under natural environmental conditions, this bond does not break down. Consequently, these chemicals do not degrade in the environment or in the human body. Instead, they accumulate over time.
This durability was exactly why they were created. Manufacturers wanted materials that repelled oil, water, and heat. However, that same durability means that a molecule of PFAS manufactured in the 1950s could still be circulating in the ecosystem today.
The concern regarding PFAS in rainwater is driven by our evolving understanding of how toxic these substances are. In June 2022, the US EPA updated its drinking water health advisories for two of the most common PFAS chemicals: PFOA and PFOS.
The change in the guidelines was dramatic:
To put this in perspective, 0.004 ppt is practically zero. It is a level so low that current standard laboratory equipment struggles to detect it. The rainwater samples from the global study often contained levels significantly higher than 0.004 ppt. This regulatory shift is the primary reason why rainwater is now technically classified as unsafe; the chemical load in the rain hasn’t necessarily spiked overnight, but our definition of “safe” has plummeted based on new toxicity data.
Exposure to these chemicals is linked to several serious health issues, including:
You might wonder how these chemicals reached Antarctica. The answer lies in their widespread industrial application and the water cycle. When PFAS-laden water evaporates from the ocean, sea spray aerosols carry the chemicals into the atmosphere, where they travel on wind currents before falling as rain.
Historically, major corporations like 3M and DuPont (now involving spin-offs like Chemours) were the primary manufacturers of these compounds. They were essential ingredients in products that defined modern convenience:
Recently, 3M agreed to a settlement of up to $10.3 billion to address claims regarding PFAS contamination in public water systems in the United States. This legal action highlights the direct link between industrial manufacturing and the current water crisis.
While the news about rainwater is concerning, it highlights the importance of filtration for drinking water. Generally, standard pitcher filters (like basic activated carbon filters) are not sufficient to remove PFAS to the low levels recommended by the EPA.
If you rely on well water or rainwater collection systems, you need robust filtration technology. The two most effective methods verified for PFAS removal are:
Scientists are also working on “PFAS annihilator” technologies. For example, researchers at Northwestern University recently discovered a method using low temperatures and common reagents (sodium hydroxide) to degrade PFAS. While this is promising for industrial cleanup, it is not yet available for residential use.
Is it safe to drink rainwater if I boil it? No. Boiling water actually increases the concentration of PFAS. Because PFAS do not break down under heat and water evaporates during boiling, the remaining chemicals become more concentrated.
Can plants absorb PFAS from rainwater? Yes. If you are gardening with rainwater, plants can uptake these chemicals. The concentration varies by plant type, with leafy greens generally absorbing more than fruit-bearing plants like tomatoes.
How do I know if my tap water has PFAS? You cannot taste, smell, or see PFAS. The only way to know is through laboratory testing. In the US, the EPA requires utilities to monitor for these chemicals, and you can request a water quality report from your local provider.
Are all non-stick pans dangerous? Most modern non-stick pans produced after 2013 are PFOA-free. However, many still use other forms of PFAS (like PTFE). Ceramic pans are a popular alternative that do not use these chemicals.